Kane99

Has anyone heard of this game? From what I see, it's a sim style game where you run a laundromat and have a secret arcade that you run in the back. You literally have to run the laundromat as well as the arcade. So it looks a lot like a sim game. Eventually you find a back room that you can use to set up an arcade. I don't know if this is something for me, but I'm willing to give it a try maybe. It's for PS4, PS5 & PC.

Was going to make a topic about this game, but figured I'd revive this one instead. Has anyone here played the new Evil Dead game? I hear it's a hit, but since its release I haven't seen much about it. It released in May and I remember seeing news about it almost daily, now it's been kinda forgotten. Or I'm just not seeing much on it as of late. Anyway, would you recommend getting it? It looks like a far better version of the Friday the 13th game.

Well they kinda have to if they plan to continue selling currency in game. I don't know what RDR2 has in terms of currency, I don't think they're called shark cards, maybe it's just currency idk. But in RDR2 you can buy gold bars I think, and those can be used to get you in game currency. So my guess is, they would have to remove that option altogether if they plan to stop supporting RDR2 online. Because I doubt they would want people to purchase a bunch of stuff in game, to only find out that the game is dead.

Yeah if Ubisoft made the ideas their own, there probably wouldn't be any issues. The thing with Assassin's Creed: Odyssey for example, is that it's fine to take ideas and make them your own. But the way they went about it, not changing enough, shows they were lazy in the process. If they simply made their own version of the systems they borrowed, they would have been fine. I remember hearing about the RE story. It makes you wonder how many other games have taken images/graphics and other things from other forms of media and people. If I remember correctly to, with the RE situation, it took them a while to notice it. So there could be other games out there that do this exact same thing and have gotten away with it. Makes ya wonder.

Yeah that's a good point. With the recent woes of a dropped user base, it would be crazy for Xbox to make it an exclusive. On top of that, I can't see a bunch of Sony fanboys buying up a series X just to play their COD games. I think if it is to be made exclusive, it will either drive sales of the series x, or it will result in fans abandoning COD altogether. It's already happening, so changing it could be worse.

I haven't played VR games just yet, but I would have to assume that it's a lot more immersive due to the fact that you can move around some of these worlds with your own body, move your hands, fingers and other things as well. I think it becomes more immersive when you make it feel more realistic. When you have a controller in hand and are sitting in front of a screen, it doesn't feel real. But I imagine in some regards with VR games, it's a lot more immersive because it puts you into the game. idk, that's how I feel anyway.

Favorite in terms of looks and design? Or favorite in terms of the available games, and abilities? If it's the former, then I'd say the PS1 has the more fun design imo. It may be nostalgia clouding my pick, but I never thought the PS2, PS3 or even the PS4 & 5 looked that great. The PS1 just has that fun old style feel that I like. Now if we're picking my favorite in regards to the console's games, it would probably be PS2 for me. I remember playing it the most out of all of my consoles.

I did a little search and I guess the metaverse has been a concept or idea (in a book called Snow Crash) since the early 90s. At least according to wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaverse Take that with a grain of salt of course, as wikipedia isn't always 100% correct. Either way, it's been a concept for a while now, and it sounds like it could be taking shape now that VR headsets and AR devices are starting to come out. Funny to know that Facebook wasn't the first ones to think of such an idea. It's been a thing for a while it seems.

I don't plan to side with either of them too. I get where MS is coming from if what they say is true, but even so, it's essentially just like paying for exclusivity. If Sony is cool to pay a studio not to release on gamepass and stay on their service, than I think it kinda works out to exclusivity in some ways. But either way, it's going to result in nothing happening, and both sides going on their merry way.

Do you have the source for this article? I'd love to take a look. I know that SomeordinaryGamers for example has played Minecraft VR to help with his insomnia. I included the video below where he talks about this. It's really interesting, because I could see myself doing this if I had a VR headset.

Nada at the moment as I don't own a VR headset, nor have I ever tried one yet. I don't know how well I'd do in VR to be honest. Part of me thinks I could handle it for hours on end, but I don't know for sure. I would try staying in as long as I can, because I imagine I'd have fun. One of these days, when I have more money to throw around, I'll maybe consider finally investing into a VR headset. But that will probably be a while before that happens.

For me, it's way too much, but if I ever get to a point where I can afford that and more, I would maybe consider it. Combine that with that omni device you can walk on, and maybe we got a real virtual world. 😄 Also, I just shot them an email to see what their pricing is. My guess is they won't respond, but would be pretty dope if they did. My guess it'll be over $5000. What's your guess?

Oh of course. Gaming is a hobby, it isn't something I'd say is important. Well, maybe important to myself, but it isn't important to others that I or you game. It's like any other hobby. I just can't stand when people go out of their way to badmouth it, when they have similar hobbies and do similar things. Just the hypocritical aspect of it bugs me. And now days, some could claim it's more than a hobby. Either it be a pro gamer competing in an esports tournament, or someone who streams video games on Twitch to make donations. I'd say in a away that is a bit different, but still it's just someone using their hobby to make money.

Yeah it'll probably be a while before I get my hands on the game, but it's a definite buy for me eventually. I could see it eventually dropping on gamepass, if so, I'll probably just get gamepass for the time being and play it that way. Saves me money and I can wait a little longer anyway. Plus, I kinda want to wait and see what people think before I pick it up. Read some reviews and then maybe watch some streams of it to get more of an idea of whether I'd like it or not.

Humbe Bundle is at it again with a great bundle of games, this time being for the Resident Evil franchise. The bundle includes 11 games in total if you pay the base price of $30. But it gets you: So yeah, not a bad deal at all for $30. If I had the cash to spare at the moment, I'd for sure take advantage of this. You can find this deal below. https://www.humblebundle.com/games/resident-evil-decades-horror Moderator Edit: This bundle is available now and will remain on offer until August 24th.

For me, I don't mind playing a sports game every once in a while. From Madden to NBA, but that's really about it. I more focus on Madden since I'm into football, but I only play because it's the only football game on the market. I have gone back to play ESPN NFL 2K5, because it's hands down my favorite sports game. And honestly it blows Madden out of the water in presentation, animations, and overall gameplay, at least in my opinion. When a game that is nearly 20 years old, it is surprisingly ahead of its time. With that being said though, what would you say are the worst gaming franchises out of these options? Madden, NBA 2K, FIFA and I put other as an option as well. For me, Madden is still the worst, since it hasn't changed enough to warrant the yearly releases, at least for me. What is your choice though?

Source: https://hypebeast.com/2022/8/twitch-facebook-gaming-youtube-gaming-hours-watched-decline-q2-2022 I think there are a few reasons why game streams are seeing a drop in viewers. 1) I think Covid helped increase the amount of people streaming, and now that everything is open up again, people aren't watching as much anymore. 2) I think just chatting streams are becoming more popular these days, and I think that's partly to blame as well. I could see more people viewing a just chatting stream versus a gameplay stream. Look at that Hassan guy, he gets like 30,000 viewers watching his stuff. It's crazy how many people are watching him. Plus the hot tub streamers are probably taking viewers away from game streamers as well, but I doubt it's a lot. But yeah, those are my thoughts on it. What about you?

I wouldn't worry about it too much, considering that they've done countless studies on video games and violence and haven't found any correlation between the two, as in it doesn't cause violence. But it could be argued again, that violent people will seek out violent video games, but I don't think they have the ability to make people violent or change one's mentality to do something heinous or wrong.

WWE Games are my jam, I used to play the hell out of WWE Smackdown: Here Comes The Pain. It's my all time favorite wrestling video game, and one I frequently come back to. I was actually thinking of streaming it somehow, but I'd probably have to emulate it instead. I don't really feel like bringing out my PS2 when I could probably emulate it and get better graphics from it. But yeah, WWE games are a blast. Sadly the games are a bit lacking today. I liked 2K22, but I didn't stick with it for too long.

To be fair to EA, it's not just them pricing games at $70. It seems most companies are adopting the $70 price tag, because everyone else is doing it. I think Ubisoft held off on it for a while, but they too are charging $70 for new games. If the game is worth the price, people will pay it though. As long as the game isn't a failure, it will sell just fine at $70. It sucks having to pay that much for a game, so I'll just wait longer for it. No biggie.

Yeah true. When I heard about Red Dead Redemption 1, I thought it was a direct sequel to revolver. I also thought the sequel to RDR1 was going to be similar to what you said, but I thought it'd be like Red Dead Revenge or Red Dead Retaliation or something. The only tie in to Revolver that I know of, was in RDR1 online, where you could open a few of the characters from Revolver, I think Harlowe was one of them, and a few others. I never opened any of them though because I think it I doubt it will happen, but I think it'd be interesting to see happen. One big thing that says no to me, is probably the fact that Revolver is a completely different game in terms of gameplay and story, so in order for them to do a remake, they would probably have to rebuild it to how RDR1 and 2 are so that fans can easily get into it.

It's especially annoying when family says it, because they think you're wasting your life away gaming or something. I can understand to some extent why they say that, but it's just hypocritical to me when they say stuff like that and then turn around to watch sports or tv. Times are changing though and people aren't saying it that much anymore.

Well not necessarily. In games like GTA and RDR, using passive mode allows you to play the game still, but you won't be interrupted by real players. So if you want to do that mission alone, you can still do it, but you won't have to deal with other players trying to kill you in the process. It's the same with GTA V, as you turn it on, players can't bother you and you can't bother them, but you can still shoot npcs and cause havoc if you like. I think something like that, would help solve griefing and players from attacking you.

Oh for sure. I don't think they can win if they make it exclusive. Allowing COD to stick on all consoles is ideal, because there's millions of dollars there for the taking if so. As well, they can make Sony and other consoles pay up if they want the game on their platform. I bet Sony will be paying some fees. Much like you said about a new deal. I could see them charging Sony and others money for having the game on their platform. And to be fair, they can do that. It reminds me of how Blu-ray took over and how MS had to license the use of blu-ray for their Xbone and Series X. I feel it's kinda similar in this situation. They can just charge Sony more money.

Here comes the drama. It looks like Microsoft isn't too happy, as they recently accused Sony of paying developers to keep games off of Xbox's Game pass service. But, Sony isn't too happy about Microsoft buying everything up as of late. Honestly it's just two money giants arguing about money. I don't know who to side on this one. In a way I agree with Microsoft, because Sony shouldn't be stopping third party studios from adding their games to gamepass, but also Microsoft shouldn't be buying up all the major studios and making Sony worry about whether or not those games will also be coming out for their platforms. What do you guys think? You can read this story here - https://en.as.com/meristation_en/2022/08/11/news/1660231627_950415.html