Most common missed opportunities in remasters?

[StaceyPowers]

What opportunities do you think developers most commonly overlook (or simply ignore) for making improvements with game remasters?

[Justin11]

They simply forget the issues around gaming, and doing what's pleasing to them. For a video game to be certified fantastic, with plaudits to the devs, the gameplay at least needs to be standard, together with the graphics and contents. The game companies failed in that aspect, because they aren't interested to improve on that. 

Edited December 5, 2021 by Justin11

[Head_Hunter]

They should address the issue of bugs, build the contents to be astounding, also the graphics and most importantly the gameplay. 

[Justin11]

Bugs issues is simply thing of increasingly serious matter. The game devs should simply delve into it and make it a priority to rectify issues of continuous bugs. 

[Kane99]

Lately it's doing a lazy job of remastering. From the Silent Hill remastered set to the recent GTA trilogy remaster, they have been doing a bad job for a while now. 

I think developers who want to remaster their games, should do a lot more than just a fresh coat of paint. They need to optimize these games for the time, update the problems and iron it all out. For the GTA trilogy, they clearly needed more time to develop something better. I hoped for a game that controlled like a modern game, and graphics that were close to what maybe GTA IV offered at least. Or even the newer GTA V graphics. 

If they want to make something the definitive edition, they need to make sure it's better than the original version.