Should Game Reviews Consider Long-Term Value (Post-Launch Updates, DLCs, etc.)?

[killamch89]

When reviewing a game, should critics take into account its long-term value, such as planned updates, downloadable content (DLC), or potential expansions? While early impressions matter, games can evolve significantly after launch, often improving or changing with updates. Should reviews reflect the promise of these updates, or should they only focus on the current state of the game at release? What’s your take on factoring post-launch support into game reviews?

[Scorpion]

Reviews should definitely consider long-term value and planned updates. A game’s potential for growth can greatly enhance its overall worth.

[killamch89]

Critics should focus on the launch state but mention plans for future updates and DLCs as a secondary consideration. This way, the review remains grounded while giving context about the game’s potential long-term value.