killamch89 Posted March 31 Share Posted March 31 I’ve been revisiting classic arcade systems and am curious about your comparisons between the Neo‑Geo AES and the MVS. In terms of performance, design, and overall gaming experience, what are the key differences you’ve noticed? Some argue that the AES offers a more home-friendly experience while the MVS stands out in arcades due to its versatility and durability. Share your thoughts on gameplay performance, graphical fidelity, and any personal experiences with both systems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorpion Posted Thursday at 07:16 PM Share Posted Thursday at 07:16 PM The Neo-Geo AES feels more refined for home use, with its sleek design and high-quality graphics making games like *King of Fighters* exceptional. In contrast, the MVS excels in arcade settings, offering durability and versatility. Both provide top-notch performance, but the AES feels more personal! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killamch89 Posted Friday at 10:39 PM Author Share Posted Friday at 10:39 PM While processing performance was identical, the cartridge verification process on AES created longer initial load times than MVS. This was especially noticeable in tournament settings where MVS cabinets could cycle between matches faster, though the actual gameplay performance remained identical once loaded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
