MelbourneStar585 Posted December 10, 2019 Share Posted December 10, 2019 If we have full dive VR would there still be people living in real life? Maybe it comes down to personal preference? I am referring to VR brain implants, not headsets.i.e sao, the matrix etc Excluding factors such as morals and religion, eating and drinking, bodily functions, need for money, need to reproduce Or we could have the majority people who spend the majority of time in the real world (in other words split time between real life and FIVR), or some people who spend their entire lives in full time. Maybe Full Dive Virtual reality will only serve a niche for addicts, hardcore gamers or scientists who want to explore other planets In VR people can do things such as fly, and do magic effects which can't be done in the real world which increases their happiness. Would we get a 75 percent uptake maybe? Thanks DC 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaceyPowers Posted December 11, 2019 Share Posted December 11, 2019 Assuming bodily needs are met and folks are taking care of their families/pets, I personally would be totally cool with a broader definition of "reality," that incorporated digital metaverses as viable living spaces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MelbourneStar585 Posted December 12, 2019 Author Share Posted December 12, 2019 (edited) Reply deleted by user - it was a bit off topic Edited December 12, 2019 by MelbourneStar585 Off topic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skyfire Posted December 13, 2019 Share Posted December 13, 2019 I'd say if you can get good wife, kids, family, job in VR which you can't get in the real life. Go ahead live in the VR. Nobody needs to suffer in real world if VR can promise this world to be better for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...